Editorial
Absolute distance perception to locations off the ground plane 1559 – 1571
William B Thompson, Valentina Dilda, Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Through the looking glass: How the relationship between an object and its reflection affects the perception of distance and size 1572 – 1594
Luke A Jones, Marco Bertamini
The visual light field 1595 – 1610
Jan J Koenderink, Sylvia C Pont, Andrea J van Doorn, Astrid M L Kappers, James T Todd
Seeing double and depth with Wheatstone’s stereograms 1611 – 1623
Hiroshi Ono, Linda Lillakas, Nicholas J Wade
Visual search for type of motion is based on simple motion primitives 1624 – 1634
Todd S Horowitz, Jeremy M Wolfe, Jennifer S DiMase, Sarah B Klieger
Faces as objects of non-expertise: Processing of thatcherised faces in congenital prosopagnosia 1635 – 1645
Claus-Christian Carbon, Thomas Grüter, Joachim E Weber, Andreas Lueschow
Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: Beyond the internal/external feature distinction 1646 – 1659
Kevin R Brooks, Richard I Kemp
Perception of novel faces: The parts have it! 1660 – 1673
Janek S Lobmaier, Fred W Mast
Beauty is in the ‘we’ of the beholder: Greater agreement on facial attractiveness among close relations 1674 – 1681
P Matthew Bronstad, Richard Russell
Haptically straight lines 1682 – 1697
Abram F J Sanders, Astrid M L Kappers
Olfactory hedonic context affects both self-report and behavioural indices of palatability 1698 – 1708
Richard J Stevenson, Caroline Tomiczek, Megan Oaten
Last but not least
Erratum 1712
