Cite as:
Aberg K C, Herzog M H, 2009, "Temporal patterning of 'unlearnable' stimuli types does not always enable learning" Perception 38 ECVP Abstract Supplement, page 99

Temporal patterning of 'unlearnable' stimuli types does not always enable learning

K C Aberg, M H Herzog

Presenting two or more stimulus types randomly interleaved, so-called roving stimuli, disrupts perceptual learning in many paradigms. It was recently reported that learning with disrupting stimuli types is possible when stimuli are presented in an alternating sequence, ie stimulus from type A, then type B, then type A, etc. In our experiment we used used bisection stimuli, but found the opposite pattern of results. Presentation of bisection stimuli in a sequence disrupted perceptual learning. We tried to explain these seemingly contradictory results by conducting a meta-analysis. Participants who initially performed the task at a low level, ie 'bad performers', were able to learn, whereas the 'good performers' did not (good performers were still outside the ceiling range). Therefore, interleaving stimuli may not abolish perceptual learning, they may just make it more difficult and more prone to interact with other factors, such as the initial performance level.

These web-based abstracts are provided for ease of seaching and access, but certain aspects (such as as mathematics) may not appear in their optimum form. For the final published version of this abstract, please see
ECVP 2009 Abstract Supplement (complete) size: 2236 Kb

[Publisher's note: The abstracts in this year's ECVP supplement have been published with virtually no copy editing by Pion, thus the standards of grammar and style may not match those of regular Perception articles.]