Cite as:
Schloss K B, Palmer S E, 2011, "The role of spatial organization in preference for color pairs" Perception 40(9) 1063 – 1080
Download citation data in RIS format

The role of spatial organization in preference for color pairs

Karen B Schloss, Stephen E Palmer

Received 10 April 2011, in revised form 12 August 2011

Abstract. We investigated how spatial organization influences color-pair preference asymmetries: differential preference for one color pair over another when the pairs contain the same colors in opposite spatial configurations. Schloss and Palmer (2011, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 73 551 – 571) found weak figure – ground preference asymmetries for small squares centered on large squares in aesthetic ratings. Here, we found robust preference asymmetries using a more sensitive forced-choice task: participants strongly prefer pairs with yellower, lighter figures on bluer, darker grounds (experiment 1). We also investigated which spatial factors influence these preference asymmetries. Relative area of the two component regions is clearly important, and perceived 3-D area of the 2-D displays (ie after the ground is amodally completed behind the figure) is more influential than 2-D area (experiment 2). Surroundedness is not required, because yellowness – blueness effects were comparable for pairs in which the figure was surrounded by the ground, and for mosaic arrangements in which the regions were adjacent and separated by a gap (experiment 3). Lightness – darkness effects, however, were opposite for figure – ground versus mosaic organizations: people prefer figure – ground organizations in which smaller regions are lighter, but prefer mosaic organizations in which smaller regions are darker. Physiological, phenomenological, and ecological explanations of the reported results are discussed.

This article has supplementary online material: Colour figures

Restricted material:

 Full-text PDF size: 1394 Kb

 References  35 references, 21 with DOI links ()

Your computer (IP address: 50.16.17.90) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).