2009 volume 38(9) pages 1275 – 1283
doi:10.1068/p6347

Cite as:
Main J C, Jones B C, DeBruine L M, Little A C, 2009, "Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others" Perception 38(9) 1275 – 1283
Download citation data in RIS format

Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others

Julie C Main, Benedict C Jones, Lisa M DeBruine, Anthony C Little

Received 8 December 2008, in revised form 13 March 2009

Abstract. Although gaze direction and face shape have each been shown to affect perceptions of the dominance of others, the question whether gaze direction and face shape have independent main effects on perceptions of dominance, and whether these effects interact, has not yet been studied. To investigate this issue, we compared dominance ratings of faces with masculinised shapes and direct gaze, masculinised shapes and averted gaze, feminised shapes and direct gaze, and feminised shapes and averted gaze. While faces with direct gaze were generally rated as more dominant than those with averted gaze, this effect of gaze direction was greater when judging faces with masculinised shapes than when judging faces with feminised shapes. Additionally, faces with masculinised shapes were rated as more dominant than those with feminised shapes when faces were presented with direct gaze, but not when faces were presented with averted gaze. Collectively, these findings reveal an interaction between the effects of gaze direction and sexually dimorphic facial cues on judgments of the dominance of others, presenting novel evidence for the existence of complex integrative processes that underpin social perception of faces. Integrating information from face shape and gaze cues may increase the efficiency with which we perceive the dominance of others.

This article has supplementary online material: Colour figure

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 340 Kb

HTML References  40 references, 37 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 50.19.155.235) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).