2009 volume 38(5) pages 740 – 747
doi:10.1068/p6162

Cite as:
Reed C F, Krupinski E A, 2009, "Terrestrial-passage theory: Failing a test" Perception 38(5) 740 – 747

Download citation data in RIS format

Terrestrial-passage theory: Failing a test

Charles F Reed, Elizabeth A Krupinski

Received 2 October 2007, in revised form 2 October 2008; published online 18 May 2009

Abstract. Terrestrial-passage theory proposes that the ‘moon’ and ‘sky’ illusions occur because observers learn to expect an elevation-dependent transformation of visual angle. The transformation accompanies daily movement through ordinary environments of fixed-altitude objects. Celestial objects display the same visual angle at all elevations, and hence are necessarily non-conforming with the ordinary transformation. On hypothesis, observers should target angular sizes to appear greater at elevation than at horizon. However, in a sample of forty-eight observers there was no significant difference between the perceived angular size of a constellation of stars at horizon and that predicted for a specific elevation. Occurrence of the illusion was not restricted to those observers who expected angular expansion. These findings fail to support the terrestrial-passage theory of the illusion.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 374 Kb

HTML References  13 references, 6 with DOI links (Crossref)

Your computer (IP address: 23.22.212.158) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).