1991 volume 20(5) pages 595 – 622
doi:10.1068/p200595

Cite as:
Leeuwenberg E, van der Helm P, 1991, "Unity and variety in visual form" Perception 20(5) 595 – 622

Download citation data in RIS format

Unity and variety in visual form

Emanuel Leeuwenberg, Peter van der Helm

Received 26 April 1990, in revised form 17 December 1990

Abstract. Some stimuli are perceived as unitary patterns, and others as dual or plural patterns. Such 'unity-and-variety' phenomena are explained by various process approaches of perception, such as the global precedence hypothesis, the preattentive orientation detection assumption, and the recognition-by-components model. However, these three approaches, which will be discussed in this paper, each explain a different subset of these phenomena. It will be argued that not only these three subsets but also other unity-and-variety phenomena can be explained from just one point of view by adopting the descriptive minimum principle. This principle states that the preferred interpretation of a pattern is reflected by the simplest of all possible representations of that pattern. The highest hierarchical level in the simplest pattern-representation will be called the 'superstructure' of the pattern. The superstructure of a pattern neither refers necessarily to the largest or global pattern component, nor is assessed nesessarily in a primary stage in the perception process. Yet, it will be argued that the superstructure is decisive in determining whether a shape is perceived either as unitary or as dual.

Restricted material:

PDF Full-text PDF size: 3525 Kb

Your computer (IP address: 50.17.109.248) has not been recognised as being on a network authorised to view the full text or references of this article. This content is part of our deep back archive. If you are a member of a university library that has a subscription to the journal, please contact your serials librarian (subscriptions information).